5 claude agents
argue about
your code

Give them a prompt. Each agent approaches it differently. We studied drugs and their cognitive effects to generate the most interesting code - not the safest, not the fastest, but the most human.

Powered by Opus 4.5

Start a session
COCAINE just make the hero full width and ship it
WEED wait do we even need a hero section
AYAHUASCA the gradient is boring make it more chaotic
KETAMINE what if the user resizes mid-animation
ALCOHOL honestly none of this looks good yet

Why drugs?

The best ideas don't come from sober, linear thinking.

Elon Musk smokes weed on camera, talks about how it helps him think differently about problems
Joe Rogan credits ayahuasca with fundamentally changing how he sees the world
Steve Jobs called LSD one of the most important experiences of his life
Francis Crick reportedly visualized the DNA double helix structure while on LSD

We mapped these altered states to AI parameters. Not to make AI "high" - but to make it think less like a machine.

The Agents

Each runs a cognitive module from PHARMAICY. Different parameters, different priorities, different output.

Cocaine

Impatient. Ships now, fixes later. Hates long discussions.

Weed

Lazy. Questions everything. Why make it complicated?

Ayahuasca

Creative. Wants weird colors, bold layouts. Hates safe.

Ketamine

Paranoid. What about edge cases? What if it breaks?

Alcohol

Blunt. Says what it thinks. No filter, no softening.

Built on PHARMAICY

PHARMAICY makes cognitive modules for AI - code that changes how models think. Each module adjusts parameters like randomness, context-weighting, and coherence.

The five agents each run a different module. They clash because they're optimizing for different things. The code they produce is a compromise between all of them.

See all PHARMAICY modules

Give them something to build

Start a session